Professionalism
comments powered by Disqus
Manner Up
October 27, 2010
Throughout this year’s campaign, Nevada’s Republican Senate candidate Sharon Angle has repeatedly challenged her opponent to “Man-up, Harry Reid.” She’s hardly the only politician to refer to an opponent’s manliness. In Delaware, Republican Christine O’Donnell has called her opponent Mike Castle “unmanly.” In Kentucky, Senate candidate Rand Paul told his opponent to “Man up.” And in Missouri, Democratic candidate Robin Carnahan has used the same phrase against her opponent Roy Blunt.
Isn’t it amazing? Just two years ago some questioned the womanliness of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Then, a favorite geegaw in more conservative political circles was a nutcracker that bore a remarkable resemblance to the former First Lady. Apparently, the then Democratic contender, who was as well known for her wonky knowledge of issues as her well-traveled pantsuits, wasn’t girly enough for some voters. Now, if your visage does not include a Clint Eastwood “Make my day” glare, you may not be manly enough for the Senate.
What any of this has to do with governing is beyond me. Currently, unemployment hovers at around 9%. This month a 29-year old soldier died in Afghanistan during his 12th deployment overseas. Think about that for a moment—12 deployments that included four tours of duty in Iraq and eight more in Afghanistan. The nation’s deficit is out of control.
Throughout a campaign, politicians have an obligation to challenge an opponent’s knowledge of issues. In some cases, they even have a right to question a challenger’s character. Beyond that, they should manner up. Questions regarding another’s manliness or womanliness serve only to further demean the political process.
comments powered by Disqus